Message-ID: <20645478.1075858641224.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: k..allen@enron.com
To: keith.holst@enron.com, matt.smith@enron.com
Subject: FW: El Paso Update 7/23/011
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Allen, Phillip K. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PALLEN>
X-To: Holst, Keith </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kholst>, Smith, Matt </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Msmith18>
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \PALLEN (Non-Privileged)\Allen, Phillip K.\Sent Items
X-Origin: Allen-P
X-FileName: PALLEN (Non-Privileged).pst



 -----Original Message-----
From:   Walsh, Kristin
Sent:   Monday, July 23, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Grigsby, Mike
Cc: Presto, Kevin M.; Tholan, Scott; Turner, Nancy
Subject:    El Paso Update 7/23/011


Sources at OPS indicate that once OPS completes its review of line 1110 and approves it to come back online, there is no formal process to grant El Paso permission to bring the entire system back to full capacity at 1.1 bcf/d. Therefore, once the inspection/repairs are completed by El Paso, the company will seek permission from OPS to resume to full service. OPS would probably grant them approval within a matter of days. The uncertainty still lies in the time it will take to interpret pigging data and for OPS to conduct its review.